Tab. 1: According to the item Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), here partially modified and partially reported, the severity of catatonia is. The Bush- Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) is a standardised, quantifiable examination of catatonia designed to screen and diagnose. The Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) was the tool used to ascertain catatonia signs in study patients. The first 14 items of the BFCRS make up the.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||2 July 2011|
|PDF File Size:||12.3 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Catatonia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs with primary psychiatric disorders or secondary to general medical conditions.
Catatonia is often neglected when screening and examining psychiatric patients. Undiagnosed catatonia can increase morbidity and mortality, illustrating the need to effectively screen patients for catatoniaa of catatonia as well as their response to treatment. There are many barriers to the diagnosis of catatonia that may explain the low rates of diagnosis in modern psychiatry. This article will review the many barriers that exist in the detection, recognition, and diagnosis of catatonia.
Various criteria and rating scales have been buush to catatonia.
The lack of precise definitions and validity of catatonia has hindered the detection of catatonia, thus delaying diagnosis and appropriate treatment. This review article will illustrate the need for a new rating scale to screen and detect catatonia as it occurs in a variety of healthcare settings. This article will also review the characteristics such a scale should possess to produce a quality instrument to aid in the appropriate care of the catatonic patient.
Catatonia has been identified in a variety of psychiatric, medical and neurological disorders, and drug-induced states. The word catatonia is Greek for tension insanity, a concept developed by Kahlbaum to describe a new illness.
His concept of catatonia was later marginalized by Kraepelian psychiatry to a subtype of schizophrenia and was largely ignored in most medical and psychiatric settings.
The modern classification must include catatonia as it occurs on acute and chronic psychiatric units, emergency departments, intensive care units, nursing home settings, and outpatient clinics.
The practical issue for a clinician in modern times is to determine whether the patient presents with catatonia. In most clinical settings, systematic screening for depression, anxiety, suicidal risk, and substance abuse are commonly performed.
However, scales to screen for catatonia in neuropsychiatric settings are often neglected.
The Detection and Measurement of Catatonia
There is a practical value in detecting catatonia because lorazepam, raing therapy ECTand other treatments have continued to demonstrate improvement in response and outcome. Failure to identify catatonia may result in increased morbidity and mortality. The problems with the detection and measurement of catatonia have been summarized by Caroff and Ungvari.
Catatonic signs must be elicited by examination but are usually not observed nor detected by a routine clinical interview. Treatment for catatonia is effective, but response to treatment in catatonia is hard to measure. The catatonia rating scales were developed to detect and measure the severity of catatonia but they may lack the sensitivity necessary to measure improvement. A search for newer treatment approaches to catatonia will require a rating scale that is sensitive to clinical improvement in catatonia without contaminating the rest of psychopathology.
We have identified the following barriers to the detection of catatonia. First, behavior problems are overemphasized in deference to motor disorders signs. Consequently, patients who present with catatonia to a clinic or hospital will be treated as if they have a behavioral problem that is more important than the motor syndrome. Second, motor signs related to volition will are subject to psychological interpretations instead of careful observation and description i. Catatonic signs are often regarded as attention-seeking behavior.
Longer periods of observation are necessary for some catatonic signs to emerge, making it difficult to detect or identify catatonia during a clinic visit or a short hospital stay. And finally, psychiatric educators rarely include catatonic signs as an important component of their curriculum.
While there are several catatonia rating scales, these scales are not routinely taught or included in educational programs as valuable diagnostic instruments. Many clinicians believe that catatonia is not seen anymore. Consequently, those clinicians who are not familiar with the concept of catatonia do not diagnose nor treat catatonia.
The diagnosis of schizophrenia with catatonic features may be avoided in research settings. The recognition of catatonic features by criteria used to define catatonia has been found to be inadequate. Recognition of catatonia requires application of a rating scale for catatonia. Patients presenting with the following catatonic signs would not be admitted or treated if one followed DSM-IV-TR criteria; these raating echopraxia, peculiarities of speech, stereotypies, mannerisms, and grimacing.
It is important to remember that clinicians’ goal is not the quest of knowledge itself but the ability to use their available knowledge and skills to prevent and diminish the suffering cwtatonia disability of their patients.
The terminology used in the diagnostic criteria for catatonic schizophrenia has been a concern and may include 5 to 57 signs. Clear and unambiguous descriptions of terms were as follows: We found low concurrent validity in criteria terminology and suggest that a new approach to detection of catatonia is warranted.
Review of three criteria-based definitions 1115 Results of clear and unambiguous descriptions of 28 terms cattaonia to define or describe catatonia:. First, it lacks uniformity in its reference definitions as noted in Table 1. Third, while the BFCRS can be used to measure treatment response we have found that items 17 through 23 may still be present even after patients have improved clinically. Some patients would still score 3 to 12 points even when clinical improvement has occurred. The scores of items 1 through 17 may not be weighted sufficiently to detect treatment effects.
There are several important signs seen in catatonic patients that are not included. Some of the terms are not comprehensible to North American researchers e. There is a need to replace these terms with more common and easily understandable terms or to provide concise and clear definitions. Perhaps the European catatonia rating scales could provide improved detection, recognition, and measurement of treatment response and provide options for research into catatonia.
This new scale could benefit from the decade of studies using the BFCRS and from the development of other scales. Catatonia is a movement disorder as grancis as a neuropsychiatric syndrome; thus, a catatonia rating scale is akin to a movement disorder examination. The catatonia rating scale must detect patients who may exhibit catatonia and identify catatonic signs reliably.
We recommend that a new catatonia rating scale be used in a variety of clinical settings to detect, identify, and measure catatonia and its response to treatment among a population of at-risk patients. Such a scale must include reference definitions and should avoid unfamiliar and confusing historical terms.
As francos by Stompe and colleagues, the detection of catatonia can be improved if the clinician relies on a greater number of specific signs with precise reference definitions. The authors would like to thank Harold W. Joseph WY Lee, Dr.
Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS)
National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Journal List Psychiatry Edgmont v. Joseph WY Lee Dr. Find articles by Brendan T. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Catatonia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs with primary psychiatric disorders or secondary to general medical conditions.
Introduction Catatonia has been identified in a variety of psychiatric, medical and neurological disorders, and drug-induced states. Barriers to the Detection of Catatonia We have identified the following barriers to the detection of catatonia.
catatonia rating scale: Topics by
Barriers to Recognition of Catatonia The recognition of catatonic features by criteria used to define catatonia has been found to be inadequate. Barriers to the Validity of Catatonia The terminology used in the diagnostic criteria for catatonic schizophrenia has been a concern and may include 5 to 57 signs. Table 1 Review of three criteria-based definitions 1115 Open in a separate window.
Conclusion Catatonia is a movement disorder as well as a neuropsychiatric syndrome; thus, cxtatonia catatonia rating scale is akin to a movement disorder examination. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Harold W. Contributor Information Rob Kirkhart, Dr.
Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and empirical treatments for catatonia. Swartz C, Galang RL. Adverse outcome with delay in identification of catatonia in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pyschiatry. Expanding horizons cattonia catatonia research.
Taylor MA, Fink M. Catatonia in psychiatric classification: A home of its own. Catatonia as a subtype of schizophrenia. Ungvari GS, Carroll B. From psychopathology to neurobiology. American Psychiatric Press, Inc. From Psychopathology to Neurobiology. ratihg
Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) – PsychTools
Effect of study criteria on recruitment and generalizability of the results. Rating scale and standardized examination. Catatonia in an intensive care facility: Incidence, and response to benzodiazepines.
Presentation and frequency of catatonia in new admission to two acute psychiatric admission units in India and Wales. Prevalence and clinical significance of catatonic symptoms in mania. Sczle Psychiatric Press, Inc; The validity of psychiatric diagnosis revisited: The clinician’s guide buwh improve the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis.
Fink M, Taylor MA. A Clinician’s Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment.